So in the full 1350fps HS shell load, three hundred-mp is kind of a better choice With all the each individual so slightly slower burn price to present some much more fps inside the load, whilst during the CF hulls at 1200fps, greater off While using the 296/H110 which includes the slightly faster burn up rate to maintain the powder burning a touch cleaner rather.
By no means try and use smokeless powder like a substitute for black powder or almost every other type of black powder alternate.
I use 296 and obtain terrific factory seeking shells. When you are making use of Winchester HS hulls ensure you are utilizing the right data along with the HS wad as its diverse in the old compression hull data. And has long been currently instructed, weigh your shot demand as lots of them are light-weight. You need just about every bit of shot you will get in that hull. You might need to open it up so it can be dropping a consistent 225 grains of shot.
You can find not revealed load data available for this powder for everything apart from shotguns. In accordance with powder burn off price charts it is very close to 2400. Has everyone experienced any knowledge with this particular powder outside of loading shotgun shells?
I use this powder since it is often a “ball” powder, not a “stick”. I use it in my Dillon XL650. When the powder measure is ready, Each and every throw is accurate within just 0.1 grains. It creates beautifully reliable ammunition.
And yes, I have utilised all 3 powders, and could fall flats of them on stations in mixes, so you would not be able to tell which shell had what powder, Considering that the speeds and patterns are so close collectively on the 1350fps assortment, there is absolutely no feasible difference in overall performance of the shells.
This really is kinda "advanced reloading one zero one" and can be carried out when you have a grasp of what is going on at first stage.
all powder article will burn up up hulls but with these a few I might get six to 10 reloads without the need of a difficulty. Based on the hull selection there is ample tested load data on This web site for these powders. Just look for it out you won't be dissatisfied.
Accurate 1680 uses the best ballistic technicians as well as the highest top quality components collectively to assure that every gun is best served with Accurate Powders.
The data shown on This web site, together with ballistic data, was derived from tightly managed laboratory problems.
The data delivered on this Site is for general uses only and doesn't represent Specialist information. We make each and every work to make sure the accuracy and reliability of the knowledge, but we don't ensure its completeness or suitability for almost any specific intent.
At Ibericafé we provide our collaborators with technical stories with regard to the evolution with the marketplaces.
Though I haven't tried using it I concur with the considering over a four ball load, appears like the identical difficulty as I Beforehand pointed out which has a five pellet load you could check here of OOO buck.
I'm able to verify from initial hand encounter that the 13gr. load works similar to a attraction which has a load of three @ 0.395" balls; my loads were plastic shells but I see no purpose why it would not function with entire size metallic shells.